<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can blogs beat papers to a pulp? (Saturday &#8211; Weekend Review, 02 Dec 2006, Page 16)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pressdisplay.com/2006/12/04/can-blogs-beat-papers-to-a-pulp-saturday-weekend-review-02-dec-2006-page-16/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pressdisplay.com/2006/12/04/can-blogs-beat-papers-to-a-pulp-saturday-weekend-review-02-dec-2006-page-16/</link>
	<description>www.pressdisplay.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:40:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pressdisplay</title>
		<link>http://blog.pressdisplay.com/2006/12/04/can-blogs-beat-papers-to-a-pulp-saturday-weekend-review-02-dec-2006-page-16/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>pressdisplay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 22:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressdisplay.wordpress.com/2006/12/04/can-blogs-beat-papers-to-a-pulp-saturday-weekend-review-02-dec-2006-page-16/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of Print publishers sharing what bloggers think of their front page articles.  

You probably already know this, but for those who don&#039;t.... if a blogger posts an article from www.pressdisplay.com, not only does the blog point to the article, the paper also links back to the blogger.  So the publishers know who&#039;s blogging their articles from PressDisplay and could open discussions with bloggers and bridge the gap that currently exists (if they wanted to...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of Print publishers sharing what bloggers think of their front page articles.  </p>
<p>You probably already know this, but for those who don&#8217;t&#8230;. if a blogger posts an article from <a href="http://www.pressdisplay.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pressdisplay.com</a>, not only does the blog point to the article, the paper also links back to the blogger.  So the publishers know who&#8217;s blogging their articles from PressDisplay and could open discussions with bloggers and bridge the gap that currently exists (if they wanted to&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AltHippo</title>
		<link>http://blog.pressdisplay.com/2006/12/04/can-blogs-beat-papers-to-a-pulp-saturday-weekend-review-02-dec-2006-page-16/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>AltHippo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 22:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressdisplay.wordpress.com/2006/12/04/can-blogs-beat-papers-to-a-pulp-saturday-weekend-review-02-dec-2006-page-16/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>The article makes two points, both of which I tend to agree with:

1.) blogs have a speed and ease of access that print publications don&#039;t have.
2.) bloggers now have the ability to critique traditional media in a public way, and have taken that job on with relish.

Asuming that&#039;s a fair summary, here are my thoughts:
1.) where blogs have speed, print has mobility.  At the point where posession of a mobile device with internet access is as ubiquitous as an mp3 player or cell phone, then print becomes a much less attractive option for getting news.  As my buddy Darwin used to say: &quot;Adapt or die out.&quot;
2.) I think it would be smart of print to make friends of the bloggers, particularly those who use the print article as the basis for their post.  Reciprocal feeding of the two communities may be where the solution lies.
That could be as simple as printing blogosphere reactions for selected front page articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article makes two points, both of which I tend to agree with:</p>
<p>1.) blogs have a speed and ease of access that print publications don&#8217;t have.<br />
2.) bloggers now have the ability to critique traditional media in a public way, and have taken that job on with relish.</p>
<p>Asuming that&#8217;s a fair summary, here are my thoughts:<br />
1.) where blogs have speed, print has mobility.  At the point where posession of a mobile device with internet access is as ubiquitous as an mp3 player or cell phone, then print becomes a much less attractive option for getting news.  As my buddy Darwin used to say: &#8220;Adapt or die out.&#8221;<br />
2.) I think it would be smart of print to make friends of the bloggers, particularly those who use the print article as the basis for their post.  Reciprocal feeding of the two communities may be where the solution lies.<br />
That could be as simple as printing blogosphere reactions for selected front page articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
